Arya, V; Chigurupati, R
Treatment Algorithm for Intracranial Intrusion Injuries of the Mandibular Condyle Journal Article
In: Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 569–581, 2016.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Accidents, age, Age Factors, algorithm, ALGORITHMS, Article, assault, brain concussion, brain hematoma, Brain Injuries, clinical protocol, Clinical Protocols, condylar intrusion injury, contusion, Cranial Fossa, DECISION making, Dislocations, Early Diagnosis, facial nerve paralysis, falling, fracture reduction, hearing impairment, human, Humans, Injuries, intermethod comparison, jaw disease, laceration, liquorrhea, mandible condyle, mandible fracture, Mandibular Condyle, Mandibular Fractures, Middle, middle cranial fossa, occupational accident, open reduction, sex difference, soft tissue injury, sport injury, Systematic Review, Traffic, traffic accident
@article{Arya2016,
title = {Treatment Algorithm for Intracranial Intrusion Injuries of the Mandibular Condyle},
author = {Arya, V and Chigurupati, R},
doi = {10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.033},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Oral \& Maxillofacial Surgery},
volume = {74},
number = {3},
pages = {569--581},
abstract = {Purpose Traumatic injuries of the mandible resulting in intrusion of the condyle into the middle cranial fossa are rare and treatment is often based on anecdotal experience. The objective of this study was to develop an algorithm for the management of condylar intrusion injuries by identifying factors that influenced the treatment decision of closed versus open reduction of the condyle. Materials and Methods This study was a systematic review of the literature on intracranial intrusion injuries of the mandibular condyle. A thorough search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases and individual maxillofacial and craniofacial journal databases was conducted using the Medical Subject Heading terms condylar impaction, condylar dislocation, condylar intrusion, and middle cranial fossa and condyle without date and language restriction. Quantitative data on the patient's age, gender, etiology of injury, and time from injury to diagnosis were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The authors studied how the predictor variables of age, etiology, time from injury to diagnosis, and associated neurologic injuries influenced the outcome variable of closed versus open reduction of the condyle. Results Forty-eight of the 62 retrieved case reports, case series, and review articles were published in the English-language literature from 1963 to 2015. Data on 51 patients with these injuries showed that 38 (75%) were female and younger than 30 years. The most common etiology of injury was motor vehicular accidents, occurring in 25 of 51 patients (49%). The mean time from injury to diagnosis was 31.2 days (0 to 106.4 days). Forty of the 51 patients (78%) were diagnosed within the first 2 weeks of injury. A good proportion of patients underwent open reduction (63%) and 18 of the 51 of patients (35%) underwent closed reduction. Conclusions Predictor variables that influenced the treatment decision of open versus closed reduction were age of the patient, etiology of injury, and time from injury to diagnosis. Based on the present results, younger patients (0 to 15 yr old), patients who sustain condylar intrusion injuries from bicycle accidents, and those diagnosed within the first 2 weeks of injury are more likely to benefit from closed reduction. The treatment algorithm emphasizes the importance of assessment of associated neurologic injuries and an interdisciplinary approach for the management of these injuries. © 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.},
keywords = {Accidents, age, Age Factors, algorithm, ALGORITHMS, Article, assault, brain concussion, brain hematoma, Brain Injuries, clinical protocol, Clinical Protocols, condylar intrusion injury, contusion, Cranial Fossa, DECISION making, Dislocations, Early Diagnosis, facial nerve paralysis, falling, fracture reduction, hearing impairment, human, Humans, Injuries, intermethod comparison, jaw disease, laceration, liquorrhea, mandible condyle, mandible fracture, Mandibular Condyle, Mandibular Fractures, Middle, middle cranial fossa, occupational accident, open reduction, sex difference, soft tissue injury, sport injury, Systematic Review, Traffic, traffic accident},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Billock, R M; Anderegg, J J; Mehan, T J; Chounthirath, T; Smith, G A
Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012 Journal Article
In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1745–1749, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Accidental Falls, Adolescent, adult, arm fracture, Article, body regions, Child, Concussion, emergency health service, Emergency Service, emergency ward, EPIDEMIOLOGY, falling, Female, head and neck injury, head injury, Hospital, hospitalization, human, Humans, Infant, leg injury, major clinical study, Male, Newborn, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, recreation, residential area, SAFETY, soft tissue injury, sport injury, sprain, statistics and numerical data, trunk injury, UNITED States, Wounds and Injuries, Young Adult, zipline related injury
@article{Billock2015,
title = {Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012},
author = {Billock, R M and Anderegg, J J and Mehan, T J and Chounthirath, T and Smith, G A},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.022},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Emergency Medicine},
volume = {33},
number = {12},
pages = {1745--1749},
abstract = {Purpose To investigate the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries in the United States. Basic Procedures The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was used to examine non-fatal zipline-related injuries treated in US emergency departments (EDs) from 1997 through 2012. Sample weights were applied to calculate national estimates. Main Findings From 1997 through 2012, an estimated 16 850 (95% CI, 13 188-20 512) zipline-related injuries were treated in US EDs. The annual injury rate per 1 million population increased by 52.3% from 7.64 (95% CI, 4.86-10.42) injuries in 2009 (the first year with a stable annual estimate) to 11.64 (95% CI, 7.83-15.45) injuries in 2012. Patients aged 0-9 years accounted for 45.0% of injuries, females made up 53.1% of injuries, and 11.7% of patients required hospitalization. Fractures accounted for the largest proportion of injuries (46.7%), and the upper extremities were the most commonly injured body region (44.1%). Falls were the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 77.3% of injuries. Among cases where the location of the injury event was known, 30.8% of injuries occurred in a residential setting and 69.2% occurred in a public place. Principal Conclusions This study is the first to characterize the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries using a nationally representative database. The rapid increase in zipline-related injuries in recent years suggests the need for additional safety guidelines and regulations. Commercial ziplines and publicly accessible non-commercial ziplines should be subject to uniform safety standards in all states and jurisdictions across the US, and homemade ziplines should not be used. © 2015 Elsevier Inc.},
keywords = {Accidental Falls, Adolescent, adult, arm fracture, Article, body regions, Child, Concussion, emergency health service, Emergency Service, emergency ward, EPIDEMIOLOGY, falling, Female, head and neck injury, head injury, Hospital, hospitalization, human, Humans, Infant, leg injury, major clinical study, Male, Newborn, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, recreation, residential area, SAFETY, soft tissue injury, sport injury, sprain, statistics and numerical data, trunk injury, UNITED States, Wounds and Injuries, Young Adult, zipline related injury},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Arya, V; Chigurupati, R
Treatment Algorithm for Intracranial Intrusion Injuries of the Mandibular Condyle Journal Article
In: Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 569–581, 2016.
@article{Arya2016,
title = {Treatment Algorithm for Intracranial Intrusion Injuries of the Mandibular Condyle},
author = {Arya, V and Chigurupati, R},
doi = {10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.033},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Oral \& Maxillofacial Surgery},
volume = {74},
number = {3},
pages = {569--581},
abstract = {Purpose Traumatic injuries of the mandible resulting in intrusion of the condyle into the middle cranial fossa are rare and treatment is often based on anecdotal experience. The objective of this study was to develop an algorithm for the management of condylar intrusion injuries by identifying factors that influenced the treatment decision of closed versus open reduction of the condyle. Materials and Methods This study was a systematic review of the literature on intracranial intrusion injuries of the mandibular condyle. A thorough search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases and individual maxillofacial and craniofacial journal databases was conducted using the Medical Subject Heading terms condylar impaction, condylar dislocation, condylar intrusion, and middle cranial fossa and condyle without date and language restriction. Quantitative data on the patient's age, gender, etiology of injury, and time from injury to diagnosis were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The authors studied how the predictor variables of age, etiology, time from injury to diagnosis, and associated neurologic injuries influenced the outcome variable of closed versus open reduction of the condyle. Results Forty-eight of the 62 retrieved case reports, case series, and review articles were published in the English-language literature from 1963 to 2015. Data on 51 patients with these injuries showed that 38 (75%) were female and younger than 30 years. The most common etiology of injury was motor vehicular accidents, occurring in 25 of 51 patients (49%). The mean time from injury to diagnosis was 31.2 days (0 to 106.4 days). Forty of the 51 patients (78%) were diagnosed within the first 2 weeks of injury. A good proportion of patients underwent open reduction (63%) and 18 of the 51 of patients (35%) underwent closed reduction. Conclusions Predictor variables that influenced the treatment decision of open versus closed reduction were age of the patient, etiology of injury, and time from injury to diagnosis. Based on the present results, younger patients (0 to 15 yr old), patients who sustain condylar intrusion injuries from bicycle accidents, and those diagnosed within the first 2 weeks of injury are more likely to benefit from closed reduction. The treatment algorithm emphasizes the importance of assessment of associated neurologic injuries and an interdisciplinary approach for the management of these injuries. © 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Billock, R M; Anderegg, J J; Mehan, T J; Chounthirath, T; Smith, G A
Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012 Journal Article
In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1745–1749, 2015.
@article{Billock2015,
title = {Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012},
author = {Billock, R M and Anderegg, J J and Mehan, T J and Chounthirath, T and Smith, G A},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.022},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Emergency Medicine},
volume = {33},
number = {12},
pages = {1745--1749},
abstract = {Purpose To investigate the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries in the United States. Basic Procedures The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was used to examine non-fatal zipline-related injuries treated in US emergency departments (EDs) from 1997 through 2012. Sample weights were applied to calculate national estimates. Main Findings From 1997 through 2012, an estimated 16 850 (95% CI, 13 188-20 512) zipline-related injuries were treated in US EDs. The annual injury rate per 1 million population increased by 52.3% from 7.64 (95% CI, 4.86-10.42) injuries in 2009 (the first year with a stable annual estimate) to 11.64 (95% CI, 7.83-15.45) injuries in 2012. Patients aged 0-9 years accounted for 45.0% of injuries, females made up 53.1% of injuries, and 11.7% of patients required hospitalization. Fractures accounted for the largest proportion of injuries (46.7%), and the upper extremities were the most commonly injured body region (44.1%). Falls were the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 77.3% of injuries. Among cases where the location of the injury event was known, 30.8% of injuries occurred in a residential setting and 69.2% occurred in a public place. Principal Conclusions This study is the first to characterize the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries using a nationally representative database. The rapid increase in zipline-related injuries in recent years suggests the need for additional safety guidelines and regulations. Commercial ziplines and publicly accessible non-commercial ziplines should be subject to uniform safety standards in all states and jurisdictions across the US, and homemade ziplines should not be used. © 2015 Elsevier Inc.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Arya, V; Chigurupati, R
Treatment Algorithm for Intracranial Intrusion Injuries of the Mandibular Condyle Journal Article
In: Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 569–581, 2016.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Accidents, age, Age Factors, algorithm, ALGORITHMS, Article, assault, brain concussion, brain hematoma, Brain Injuries, clinical protocol, Clinical Protocols, condylar intrusion injury, contusion, Cranial Fossa, DECISION making, Dislocations, Early Diagnosis, facial nerve paralysis, falling, fracture reduction, hearing impairment, human, Humans, Injuries, intermethod comparison, jaw disease, laceration, liquorrhea, mandible condyle, mandible fracture, Mandibular Condyle, Mandibular Fractures, Middle, middle cranial fossa, occupational accident, open reduction, sex difference, soft tissue injury, sport injury, Systematic Review, Traffic, traffic accident
@article{Arya2016,
title = {Treatment Algorithm for Intracranial Intrusion Injuries of the Mandibular Condyle},
author = {Arya, V and Chigurupati, R},
doi = {10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.033},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Oral \& Maxillofacial Surgery},
volume = {74},
number = {3},
pages = {569--581},
abstract = {Purpose Traumatic injuries of the mandible resulting in intrusion of the condyle into the middle cranial fossa are rare and treatment is often based on anecdotal experience. The objective of this study was to develop an algorithm for the management of condylar intrusion injuries by identifying factors that influenced the treatment decision of closed versus open reduction of the condyle. Materials and Methods This study was a systematic review of the literature on intracranial intrusion injuries of the mandibular condyle. A thorough search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases and individual maxillofacial and craniofacial journal databases was conducted using the Medical Subject Heading terms condylar impaction, condylar dislocation, condylar intrusion, and middle cranial fossa and condyle without date and language restriction. Quantitative data on the patient's age, gender, etiology of injury, and time from injury to diagnosis were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The authors studied how the predictor variables of age, etiology, time from injury to diagnosis, and associated neurologic injuries influenced the outcome variable of closed versus open reduction of the condyle. Results Forty-eight of the 62 retrieved case reports, case series, and review articles were published in the English-language literature from 1963 to 2015. Data on 51 patients with these injuries showed that 38 (75%) were female and younger than 30 years. The most common etiology of injury was motor vehicular accidents, occurring in 25 of 51 patients (49%). The mean time from injury to diagnosis was 31.2 days (0 to 106.4 days). Forty of the 51 patients (78%) were diagnosed within the first 2 weeks of injury. A good proportion of patients underwent open reduction (63%) and 18 of the 51 of patients (35%) underwent closed reduction. Conclusions Predictor variables that influenced the treatment decision of open versus closed reduction were age of the patient, etiology of injury, and time from injury to diagnosis. Based on the present results, younger patients (0 to 15 yr old), patients who sustain condylar intrusion injuries from bicycle accidents, and those diagnosed within the first 2 weeks of injury are more likely to benefit from closed reduction. The treatment algorithm emphasizes the importance of assessment of associated neurologic injuries and an interdisciplinary approach for the management of these injuries. © 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.},
keywords = {Accidents, age, Age Factors, algorithm, ALGORITHMS, Article, assault, brain concussion, brain hematoma, Brain Injuries, clinical protocol, Clinical Protocols, condylar intrusion injury, contusion, Cranial Fossa, DECISION making, Dislocations, Early Diagnosis, facial nerve paralysis, falling, fracture reduction, hearing impairment, human, Humans, Injuries, intermethod comparison, jaw disease, laceration, liquorrhea, mandible condyle, mandible fracture, Mandibular Condyle, Mandibular Fractures, Middle, middle cranial fossa, occupational accident, open reduction, sex difference, soft tissue injury, sport injury, Systematic Review, Traffic, traffic accident},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Billock, R M; Anderegg, J J; Mehan, T J; Chounthirath, T; Smith, G A
Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012 Journal Article
In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1745–1749, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Accidental Falls, Adolescent, adult, arm fracture, Article, body regions, Child, Concussion, emergency health service, Emergency Service, emergency ward, EPIDEMIOLOGY, falling, Female, head and neck injury, head injury, Hospital, hospitalization, human, Humans, Infant, leg injury, major clinical study, Male, Newborn, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, recreation, residential area, SAFETY, soft tissue injury, sport injury, sprain, statistics and numerical data, trunk injury, UNITED States, Wounds and Injuries, Young Adult, zipline related injury
@article{Billock2015,
title = {Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012},
author = {Billock, R M and Anderegg, J J and Mehan, T J and Chounthirath, T and Smith, G A},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.022},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Emergency Medicine},
volume = {33},
number = {12},
pages = {1745--1749},
abstract = {Purpose To investigate the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries in the United States. Basic Procedures The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was used to examine non-fatal zipline-related injuries treated in US emergency departments (EDs) from 1997 through 2012. Sample weights were applied to calculate national estimates. Main Findings From 1997 through 2012, an estimated 16 850 (95% CI, 13 188-20 512) zipline-related injuries were treated in US EDs. The annual injury rate per 1 million population increased by 52.3% from 7.64 (95% CI, 4.86-10.42) injuries in 2009 (the first year with a stable annual estimate) to 11.64 (95% CI, 7.83-15.45) injuries in 2012. Patients aged 0-9 years accounted for 45.0% of injuries, females made up 53.1% of injuries, and 11.7% of patients required hospitalization. Fractures accounted for the largest proportion of injuries (46.7%), and the upper extremities were the most commonly injured body region (44.1%). Falls were the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 77.3% of injuries. Among cases where the location of the injury event was known, 30.8% of injuries occurred in a residential setting and 69.2% occurred in a public place. Principal Conclusions This study is the first to characterize the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries using a nationally representative database. The rapid increase in zipline-related injuries in recent years suggests the need for additional safety guidelines and regulations. Commercial ziplines and publicly accessible non-commercial ziplines should be subject to uniform safety standards in all states and jurisdictions across the US, and homemade ziplines should not be used. © 2015 Elsevier Inc.},
keywords = {Accidental Falls, Adolescent, adult, arm fracture, Article, body regions, Child, Concussion, emergency health service, Emergency Service, emergency ward, EPIDEMIOLOGY, falling, Female, head and neck injury, head injury, Hospital, hospitalization, human, Humans, Infant, leg injury, major clinical study, Male, Newborn, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, recreation, residential area, SAFETY, soft tissue injury, sport injury, sprain, statistics and numerical data, trunk injury, UNITED States, Wounds and Injuries, Young Adult, zipline related injury},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}