Walter, S R; Olivier, J; Churches, T; Grzebieta, R
The impact of compulsory helmet legislation on cyclist head injuries in New South Wales, Australia: a response Journal Article
In: Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 52, pp. 204–209, 2013.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Bicycling/lj [Legislation & Jurisprudence], *Craniocerebral Trauma/pc [Prevention & Control], *Head Protective Devices/ut [Utilization], *Safety/lj [Legislation & Jurisprudence], Bicycling/in [Injuries], Humans, New South Wales
@article{Walter2013,
title = {The impact of compulsory helmet legislation on cyclist head injuries in New South Wales, Australia: a response},
author = {Walter, S R and Olivier, J and Churches, T and Grzebieta, R},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Accident Analysis \& Prevention},
volume = {52},
pages = {204--209},
abstract = {This article responds to criticisms made in a rejoinder (Accident Analysis and Prevention 2012, 45: 107-109) questioning the validity of a study on the impact of mandatory helmet legislation (MHL) for cyclists in New South Wales, Australia. We systematically address the criticisms through clarification of our methods, extension of the original analysis and discussion of new evidence on the population-level effects of MHL. Extensions of our analysis confirm the original conclusions that MHL had a beneficial effect on head injury rates over and above background trends and changes in cycling participation. The ongoing debate around MHL draws attention away from important ways in which both safety and participation can be improved through investment in well-connected cycling infrastructure, fostering consideration between road users, and adequate legal protection for vulnerable road users. These are the essential elements for providing a cycling environment that encourages participation, with all its health, economic and environmental benefits, while maximising safety. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {*Bicycling/lj [Legislation \& Jurisprudence], *Craniocerebral Trauma/pc [Prevention \& Control], *Head Protective Devices/ut [Utilization], *Safety/lj [Legislation \& Jurisprudence], Bicycling/in [Injuries], Humans, New South Wales},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Macpherson, A K; To, T M; Macarthur, C; Chipman, M L; Wright, J G; Parkin, P C
Impact of mandatory helmet legislation on bicycle-related head injuries in children: a population-based study Journal Article
In: Pediatrics, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. e60, 2002.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Bicycling/in [Injuries], *Bicycling/lj [Legislation & Jurisprudence], *Craniocerebral Trauma/pc [Prevention & Control], *Head Protective Devices/ut [Utilization], Accidents, Adolescent, adult, Bicycling/sn [Statistics & Numerical Data], Canada/ep [Epidemiology], Child, Cohort Studies, Craniocerebral Trauma/di [Diagnosis], Craniocerebral Trauma/ep [Epidemiology], Female, Hospitalized/sn [Statistics & Numerical Dat, Humans, Incidence, Legislation as Topic/sn [Statistics & Numerical Da, Male, Preschool, Public Policy, Traffic/sn [Statistics & Numerical Data, Trauma Severity Indices
@article{Macpherson2002,
title = {Impact of mandatory helmet legislation on bicycle-related head injuries in children: a population-based study},
author = {Macpherson, A K and To, T M and Macarthur, C and Chipman, M L and Wright, J G and Parkin, P C},
year = {2002},
date = {2002-01-01},
journal = {Pediatrics},
volume = {110},
number = {5},
pages = {e60},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Childhood bicycle-related head injuries can be prevented through the use of helmets. Although helmet legislation has proved to be a successful strategy for the adoption of helmets, its effect on the rates of head injury is uncertain. In Canada, 4 provinces have such legislation. The objective of this study was to measure the impact of helmet legislation on bicycle-related head injuries in Canadian children. METHODS: Routinely collected data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information identified all Canadian children (5-19 years) who were hospitalized for bicycling-related injuries from 1994-1998. Children were categorized as head or other injury on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes. Rates of head injuries and other injuries were compared over time in provinces that adopted legislation and those that did not. RESULTS: Of the 9650 children who were hospitalized because of a bicycle-related injury, 3426 sustained injuries to the head and face and the remaining 6224 had other injuries. The bicycle-related head injury rate declined significantly (45% reduction) in provinces where legislation had been adopted compared with provinces and territories that did not adopt legislation (27% reduction). CONCLUSION: This country-wide study compared rates of head injury in regions with and without mandatory helmet legislation. Comparing head injuries with other non-head-injured children controlled for potential differences in children's cycling habits. The strong protective association between helmet legislation and head injuries supports the adoption of helmet legislation as an effective tool in the prevention of childhood bicycle-related head injuries.},
keywords = {*Bicycling/in [Injuries], *Bicycling/lj [Legislation \& Jurisprudence], *Craniocerebral Trauma/pc [Prevention \& Control], *Head Protective Devices/ut [Utilization], Accidents, Adolescent, adult, Bicycling/sn [Statistics \& Numerical Data], Canada/ep [Epidemiology], Child, Cohort Studies, Craniocerebral Trauma/di [Diagnosis], Craniocerebral Trauma/ep [Epidemiology], Female, Hospitalized/sn [Statistics \& Numerical Dat, Humans, Incidence, Legislation as Topic/sn [Statistics \& Numerical Da, Male, Preschool, Public Policy, Traffic/sn [Statistics \& Numerical Data, Trauma Severity Indices},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Walter, S R; Olivier, J; Churches, T; Grzebieta, R
The impact of compulsory helmet legislation on cyclist head injuries in New South Wales, Australia: a response Journal Article
In: Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 52, pp. 204–209, 2013.
@article{Walter2013,
title = {The impact of compulsory helmet legislation on cyclist head injuries in New South Wales, Australia: a response},
author = {Walter, S R and Olivier, J and Churches, T and Grzebieta, R},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Accident Analysis \& Prevention},
volume = {52},
pages = {204--209},
abstract = {This article responds to criticisms made in a rejoinder (Accident Analysis and Prevention 2012, 45: 107-109) questioning the validity of a study on the impact of mandatory helmet legislation (MHL) for cyclists in New South Wales, Australia. We systematically address the criticisms through clarification of our methods, extension of the original analysis and discussion of new evidence on the population-level effects of MHL. Extensions of our analysis confirm the original conclusions that MHL had a beneficial effect on head injury rates over and above background trends and changes in cycling participation. The ongoing debate around MHL draws attention away from important ways in which both safety and participation can be improved through investment in well-connected cycling infrastructure, fostering consideration between road users, and adequate legal protection for vulnerable road users. These are the essential elements for providing a cycling environment that encourages participation, with all its health, economic and environmental benefits, while maximising safety. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Macpherson, A K; To, T M; Macarthur, C; Chipman, M L; Wright, J G; Parkin, P C
Impact of mandatory helmet legislation on bicycle-related head injuries in children: a population-based study Journal Article
In: Pediatrics, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. e60, 2002.
@article{Macpherson2002,
title = {Impact of mandatory helmet legislation on bicycle-related head injuries in children: a population-based study},
author = {Macpherson, A K and To, T M and Macarthur, C and Chipman, M L and Wright, J G and Parkin, P C},
year = {2002},
date = {2002-01-01},
journal = {Pediatrics},
volume = {110},
number = {5},
pages = {e60},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Childhood bicycle-related head injuries can be prevented through the use of helmets. Although helmet legislation has proved to be a successful strategy for the adoption of helmets, its effect on the rates of head injury is uncertain. In Canada, 4 provinces have such legislation. The objective of this study was to measure the impact of helmet legislation on bicycle-related head injuries in Canadian children. METHODS: Routinely collected data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information identified all Canadian children (5-19 years) who were hospitalized for bicycling-related injuries from 1994-1998. Children were categorized as head or other injury on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes. Rates of head injuries and other injuries were compared over time in provinces that adopted legislation and those that did not. RESULTS: Of the 9650 children who were hospitalized because of a bicycle-related injury, 3426 sustained injuries to the head and face and the remaining 6224 had other injuries. The bicycle-related head injury rate declined significantly (45% reduction) in provinces where legislation had been adopted compared with provinces and territories that did not adopt legislation (27% reduction). CONCLUSION: This country-wide study compared rates of head injury in regions with and without mandatory helmet legislation. Comparing head injuries with other non-head-injured children controlled for potential differences in children's cycling habits. The strong protective association between helmet legislation and head injuries supports the adoption of helmet legislation as an effective tool in the prevention of childhood bicycle-related head injuries.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Walter, S R; Olivier, J; Churches, T; Grzebieta, R
The impact of compulsory helmet legislation on cyclist head injuries in New South Wales, Australia: a response Journal Article
In: Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 52, pp. 204–209, 2013.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Bicycling/lj [Legislation & Jurisprudence], *Craniocerebral Trauma/pc [Prevention & Control], *Head Protective Devices/ut [Utilization], *Safety/lj [Legislation & Jurisprudence], Bicycling/in [Injuries], Humans, New South Wales
@article{Walter2013,
title = {The impact of compulsory helmet legislation on cyclist head injuries in New South Wales, Australia: a response},
author = {Walter, S R and Olivier, J and Churches, T and Grzebieta, R},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Accident Analysis \& Prevention},
volume = {52},
pages = {204--209},
abstract = {This article responds to criticisms made in a rejoinder (Accident Analysis and Prevention 2012, 45: 107-109) questioning the validity of a study on the impact of mandatory helmet legislation (MHL) for cyclists in New South Wales, Australia. We systematically address the criticisms through clarification of our methods, extension of the original analysis and discussion of new evidence on the population-level effects of MHL. Extensions of our analysis confirm the original conclusions that MHL had a beneficial effect on head injury rates over and above background trends and changes in cycling participation. The ongoing debate around MHL draws attention away from important ways in which both safety and participation can be improved through investment in well-connected cycling infrastructure, fostering consideration between road users, and adequate legal protection for vulnerable road users. These are the essential elements for providing a cycling environment that encourages participation, with all its health, economic and environmental benefits, while maximising safety. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {*Bicycling/lj [Legislation \& Jurisprudence], *Craniocerebral Trauma/pc [Prevention \& Control], *Head Protective Devices/ut [Utilization], *Safety/lj [Legislation \& Jurisprudence], Bicycling/in [Injuries], Humans, New South Wales},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Macpherson, A K; To, T M; Macarthur, C; Chipman, M L; Wright, J G; Parkin, P C
Impact of mandatory helmet legislation on bicycle-related head injuries in children: a population-based study Journal Article
In: Pediatrics, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. e60, 2002.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Bicycling/in [Injuries], *Bicycling/lj [Legislation & Jurisprudence], *Craniocerebral Trauma/pc [Prevention & Control], *Head Protective Devices/ut [Utilization], Accidents, Adolescent, adult, Bicycling/sn [Statistics & Numerical Data], Canada/ep [Epidemiology], Child, Cohort Studies, Craniocerebral Trauma/di [Diagnosis], Craniocerebral Trauma/ep [Epidemiology], Female, Hospitalized/sn [Statistics & Numerical Dat, Humans, Incidence, Legislation as Topic/sn [Statistics & Numerical Da, Male, Preschool, Public Policy, Traffic/sn [Statistics & Numerical Data, Trauma Severity Indices
@article{Macpherson2002,
title = {Impact of mandatory helmet legislation on bicycle-related head injuries in children: a population-based study},
author = {Macpherson, A K and To, T M and Macarthur, C and Chipman, M L and Wright, J G and Parkin, P C},
year = {2002},
date = {2002-01-01},
journal = {Pediatrics},
volume = {110},
number = {5},
pages = {e60},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Childhood bicycle-related head injuries can be prevented through the use of helmets. Although helmet legislation has proved to be a successful strategy for the adoption of helmets, its effect on the rates of head injury is uncertain. In Canada, 4 provinces have such legislation. The objective of this study was to measure the impact of helmet legislation on bicycle-related head injuries in Canadian children. METHODS: Routinely collected data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information identified all Canadian children (5-19 years) who were hospitalized for bicycling-related injuries from 1994-1998. Children were categorized as head or other injury on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes. Rates of head injuries and other injuries were compared over time in provinces that adopted legislation and those that did not. RESULTS: Of the 9650 children who were hospitalized because of a bicycle-related injury, 3426 sustained injuries to the head and face and the remaining 6224 had other injuries. The bicycle-related head injury rate declined significantly (45% reduction) in provinces where legislation had been adopted compared with provinces and territories that did not adopt legislation (27% reduction). CONCLUSION: This country-wide study compared rates of head injury in regions with and without mandatory helmet legislation. Comparing head injuries with other non-head-injured children controlled for potential differences in children's cycling habits. The strong protective association between helmet legislation and head injuries supports the adoption of helmet legislation as an effective tool in the prevention of childhood bicycle-related head injuries.},
keywords = {*Bicycling/in [Injuries], *Bicycling/lj [Legislation \& Jurisprudence], *Craniocerebral Trauma/pc [Prevention \& Control], *Head Protective Devices/ut [Utilization], Accidents, Adolescent, adult, Bicycling/sn [Statistics \& Numerical Data], Canada/ep [Epidemiology], Child, Cohort Studies, Craniocerebral Trauma/di [Diagnosis], Craniocerebral Trauma/ep [Epidemiology], Female, Hospitalized/sn [Statistics \& Numerical Dat, Humans, Incidence, Legislation as Topic/sn [Statistics \& Numerical Da, Male, Preschool, Public Policy, Traffic/sn [Statistics \& Numerical Data, Trauma Severity Indices},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}