Sethi, N K
Post-concussion return to boxing protocol Journal Article
In: South African Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 61–62, 2016.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Boxers (Sports), Boxing, Concussion, CONCUSSION policies, PHYSIOLOGY, Return-to-play, SAFETY, SPORTS -- Safety measures
@article{Sethi2016,
title = {Post-concussion return to boxing protocol},
author = {Sethi, N K},
doi = {10.17159/2078-516X/2016/v28i2a464},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {South African Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {28},
number = {2},
pages = {61--62},
abstract = {Background: Concussion is a complex pathophysiological process affecting the brain, induced by traumatic biomechanical forces. Immediately following a concussion, an athlete is usually advised physical and cognitive rest until post-concussion symptoms abate. The athlete then enters a stepwise return-to-play protocol. Premature return to play risks a second concussion, second impact syndrome, exacerbation and persistence of post-concussive symptoms. Various sports governing organisations such as the National Football League have developed postconcussion return to play protocols. Discussion: Professional boxing is a popular contact sport in which concussions are common. Professional boxing currently lacks a standardised post-concussion return to boxing protocol. Professional boxers are arbitrarily suspended for periods ranging from 30 to 90 days after suffering a technical knockout (TKO) due to multiple head and body shots or after a knockout (KO). For some boxers a neurology clearance is requested prior to their return to boxing. Conclusion: Developing and implementing a postconcussion return to the boxing protocol will standardise a return to boxing decision-making process and help to protect a boxer's health. This paper proposes a postconcussion return to boxing protocol with the recommendation that the proposed protocol be debated vigorously by the scientific community and evidence-based guidelines be developed by the medical community in conjunction with the professional boxing governing bodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]},
keywords = {Boxers (Sports), Boxing, Concussion, CONCUSSION policies, PHYSIOLOGY, Return-to-play, SAFETY, SPORTS -- Safety measures},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Hernandez, F; Shull, P B; Camarillo, D B
Evaluation of a laboratory model of human head impact biomechanics Journal Article
In: Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3469–3477, 2015.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *HEAD, *Laboratories, *Mechanical Phenomena, *Models, Acceleration, Biological, Biomechanical Phenomena, Brain Concussion/et [Etiology], Football/in [Injuries], Head Protective Devices, Humans, Male, Neck/ph [Physiology], Rotation, SAFETY
@article{Hernandez2015,
title = {Evaluation of a laboratory model of human head impact biomechanics},
author = {Hernandez, F and Shull, P B and Camarillo, D B},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Biomechanics},
volume = {48},
number = {12},
pages = {3469--3477},
abstract = {This work describes methodology for evaluating laboratory models of head impact biomechanics. Using this methodology, we investigated: how closely does twin-wire drop testing model head rotation in American football impacts? Head rotation is believed to cause mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) but helmet safety standards only model head translations believed to cause severe TBI. It is unknown whether laboratory head impact models in safety standards, like twin-wire drop testing, reproduce six degree-of-freedom (6DOF) head impact biomechanics that may cause mTBI. We compared 6DOF measurements of 421 American football head impacts to twin-wire drop tests at impact sites and velocities weighted to represent typical field exposure. The highest rotational velocities produced by drop testing were the 74th percentile of non-injury field impacts. For a given translational acceleration level, drop testing underestimated field rotational acceleration by 46% and rotational velocity by 72%. Primary rotational acceleration frequencies were much larger in drop tests ($sim$100 Hz) than field impacts ($sim$10 Hz). Drop testing was physically unable to produce acceleration directions common in field impacts. Initial conditions of a single field impact were highly resolved in stereo high-speed video and reconstructed in a drop test. Reconstruction results reflected aggregate trends of lower amplitude rotational velocity and higher frequency rotational acceleration in drop testing, apparently due to twin-wire constraints and the absence of a neck. These results suggest twin-wire drop testing is limited in modeling head rotation during impact, and motivate continued evaluation of head impact models to ensure helmets are tested under conditions that may cause mTBI. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {*HEAD, *Laboratories, *Mechanical Phenomena, *Models, Acceleration, Biological, Biomechanical Phenomena, Brain Concussion/et [Etiology], Football/in [Injuries], Head Protective Devices, Humans, Male, Neck/ph [Physiology], Rotation, SAFETY},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Billock, R M; Anderegg, J J; Mehan, T J; Chounthirath, T; Smith, G A
Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012 Journal Article
In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1745–1749, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Accidental Falls, Adolescent, adult, arm fracture, Article, body regions, Child, Concussion, emergency health service, Emergency Service, emergency ward, EPIDEMIOLOGY, falling, Female, head and neck injury, head injury, Hospital, hospitalization, human, Humans, Infant, leg injury, major clinical study, Male, Newborn, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, recreation, residential area, SAFETY, soft tissue injury, sport injury, sprain, statistics and numerical data, trunk injury, UNITED States, Wounds and Injuries, Young Adult, zipline related injury
@article{Billock2015,
title = {Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012},
author = {Billock, R M and Anderegg, J J and Mehan, T J and Chounthirath, T and Smith, G A},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.022},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Emergency Medicine},
volume = {33},
number = {12},
pages = {1745--1749},
abstract = {Purpose To investigate the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries in the United States. Basic Procedures The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was used to examine non-fatal zipline-related injuries treated in US emergency departments (EDs) from 1997 through 2012. Sample weights were applied to calculate national estimates. Main Findings From 1997 through 2012, an estimated 16 850 (95% CI, 13 188-20 512) zipline-related injuries were treated in US EDs. The annual injury rate per 1 million population increased by 52.3% from 7.64 (95% CI, 4.86-10.42) injuries in 2009 (the first year with a stable annual estimate) to 11.64 (95% CI, 7.83-15.45) injuries in 2012. Patients aged 0-9 years accounted for 45.0% of injuries, females made up 53.1% of injuries, and 11.7% of patients required hospitalization. Fractures accounted for the largest proportion of injuries (46.7%), and the upper extremities were the most commonly injured body region (44.1%). Falls were the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 77.3% of injuries. Among cases where the location of the injury event was known, 30.8% of injuries occurred in a residential setting and 69.2% occurred in a public place. Principal Conclusions This study is the first to characterize the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries using a nationally representative database. The rapid increase in zipline-related injuries in recent years suggests the need for additional safety guidelines and regulations. Commercial ziplines and publicly accessible non-commercial ziplines should be subject to uniform safety standards in all states and jurisdictions across the US, and homemade ziplines should not be used. © 2015 Elsevier Inc.},
keywords = {Accidental Falls, Adolescent, adult, arm fracture, Article, body regions, Child, Concussion, emergency health service, Emergency Service, emergency ward, EPIDEMIOLOGY, falling, Female, head and neck injury, head injury, Hospital, hospitalization, human, Humans, Infant, leg injury, major clinical study, Male, Newborn, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, recreation, residential area, SAFETY, soft tissue injury, sport injury, sprain, statistics and numerical data, trunk injury, UNITED States, Wounds and Injuries, Young Adult, zipline related injury},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Liu, C Y; Law, M; Romano, R
Rational approach to understanding and preventing sports-related traumatic brain injuries Journal Article
In: World Neurosurgery, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1556–1557, 2015.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: accelerometer, ACCELEROMETRY, biological marker, brain, brain concussion, brain hemorrhage, cognitive defect, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Electroencephalography, emergency health service, Female, Head Protective Devices, Helmet, high risk patient, human, Humans, Injuries, Male, neuroimaging, neuromodulation, neuroprotective agent, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, Occupational Exposure, protective equipment, Review, risk factor, risk reduction, SAFETY, skiing, Snowboarding, sport injury, Traumatic, traumatic brain injury, viscoelastic substance
@article{Liu2015,
title = {Rational approach to understanding and preventing sports-related traumatic brain injuries},
author = {Liu, C Y and Law, M and Romano, R},
doi = {10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.076},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {World Neurosurgery},
volume = {84},
number = {6},
pages = {1556--1557},
keywords = {accelerometer, ACCELEROMETRY, biological marker, brain, brain concussion, brain hemorrhage, cognitive defect, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Electroencephalography, emergency health service, Female, Head Protective Devices, Helmet, high risk patient, human, Humans, Injuries, Male, neuroimaging, neuromodulation, neuroprotective agent, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, Occupational Exposure, protective equipment, Review, risk factor, risk reduction, SAFETY, skiing, Snowboarding, sport injury, Traumatic, traumatic brain injury, viscoelastic substance},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Perry, C E; Buhrman, J R
Effect of helmet inertial properties on head and neck response during +Gz impact accelerations Journal Article
In: Journal of Gravitational Physiology: a Journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. P88–91, 1995.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Acceleration/ae [Adverse Effects], *Head Protective Devices, *Neck/ph [Physiology], Aircraft, Aviation, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer simulation, Equipment Design, Head Movements, Humans, Military personnel, Motion, Neck Injuries, SAFETY
@article{Perry1995,
title = {Effect of helmet inertial properties on head and neck response during +Gz impact accelerations},
author = {Perry, C E and Buhrman, J R},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Gravitational Physiology: a Journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology},
volume = {2},
number = {1},
pages = {P88--91},
abstract = {The objective of the test program was to study the effect of parametric changes in helmet inertial properties on the biodynamic response of human volunteers subjected to +Gz impact accelerations. Test data was used to drive a computer model (DYNAMAN) to estimate the loads and torques in the neck during impact. Currently, only seven of eleven test cells with variations in the inertial properties of the helmet along the x-axis of the head have been analyzed. Preliminary data analysis indicates that the biodynamic response of the head under the tested conditions is slightly more sensitive to the moment of inertia of the helmet than its weight alone even though both variables showed a general trend for the head accelerations (linear and angular) to increase. It has been shown that the model can give good estimates of the compression loads in the neck, but that the torque estimates will be low, possibly by a factor of three. Further refinements of the neck joint parameters in the model will be required in order to increase the motion of the head segment during impact acceleration and will be done prior to completing the remaining test cell analysis. Finally, all the test data will be evaluated to determine if the current interim head criteria require modification.},
keywords = {*Acceleration/ae [Adverse Effects], *Head Protective Devices, *Neck/ph [Physiology], Aircraft, Aviation, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer simulation, Equipment Design, Head Movements, Humans, Military personnel, Motion, Neck Injuries, SAFETY},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Sethi, N K
Post-concussion return to boxing protocol Journal Article
In: South African Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 61–62, 2016.
@article{Sethi2016,
title = {Post-concussion return to boxing protocol},
author = {Sethi, N K},
doi = {10.17159/2078-516X/2016/v28i2a464},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {South African Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {28},
number = {2},
pages = {61--62},
abstract = {Background: Concussion is a complex pathophysiological process affecting the brain, induced by traumatic biomechanical forces. Immediately following a concussion, an athlete is usually advised physical and cognitive rest until post-concussion symptoms abate. The athlete then enters a stepwise return-to-play protocol. Premature return to play risks a second concussion, second impact syndrome, exacerbation and persistence of post-concussive symptoms. Various sports governing organisations such as the National Football League have developed postconcussion return to play protocols. Discussion: Professional boxing is a popular contact sport in which concussions are common. Professional boxing currently lacks a standardised post-concussion return to boxing protocol. Professional boxers are arbitrarily suspended for periods ranging from 30 to 90 days after suffering a technical knockout (TKO) due to multiple head and body shots or after a knockout (KO). For some boxers a neurology clearance is requested prior to their return to boxing. Conclusion: Developing and implementing a postconcussion return to the boxing protocol will standardise a return to boxing decision-making process and help to protect a boxer's health. This paper proposes a postconcussion return to boxing protocol with the recommendation that the proposed protocol be debated vigorously by the scientific community and evidence-based guidelines be developed by the medical community in conjunction with the professional boxing governing bodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Hernandez, F; Shull, P B; Camarillo, D B
Evaluation of a laboratory model of human head impact biomechanics Journal Article
In: Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3469–3477, 2015.
@article{Hernandez2015,
title = {Evaluation of a laboratory model of human head impact biomechanics},
author = {Hernandez, F and Shull, P B and Camarillo, D B},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Biomechanics},
volume = {48},
number = {12},
pages = {3469--3477},
abstract = {This work describes methodology for evaluating laboratory models of head impact biomechanics. Using this methodology, we investigated: how closely does twin-wire drop testing model head rotation in American football impacts? Head rotation is believed to cause mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) but helmet safety standards only model head translations believed to cause severe TBI. It is unknown whether laboratory head impact models in safety standards, like twin-wire drop testing, reproduce six degree-of-freedom (6DOF) head impact biomechanics that may cause mTBI. We compared 6DOF measurements of 421 American football head impacts to twin-wire drop tests at impact sites and velocities weighted to represent typical field exposure. The highest rotational velocities produced by drop testing were the 74th percentile of non-injury field impacts. For a given translational acceleration level, drop testing underestimated field rotational acceleration by 46% and rotational velocity by 72%. Primary rotational acceleration frequencies were much larger in drop tests ($sim$100 Hz) than field impacts ($sim$10 Hz). Drop testing was physically unable to produce acceleration directions common in field impacts. Initial conditions of a single field impact were highly resolved in stereo high-speed video and reconstructed in a drop test. Reconstruction results reflected aggregate trends of lower amplitude rotational velocity and higher frequency rotational acceleration in drop testing, apparently due to twin-wire constraints and the absence of a neck. These results suggest twin-wire drop testing is limited in modeling head rotation during impact, and motivate continued evaluation of head impact models to ensure helmets are tested under conditions that may cause mTBI. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Billock, R M; Anderegg, J J; Mehan, T J; Chounthirath, T; Smith, G A
Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012 Journal Article
In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1745–1749, 2015.
@article{Billock2015,
title = {Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012},
author = {Billock, R M and Anderegg, J J and Mehan, T J and Chounthirath, T and Smith, G A},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.022},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Emergency Medicine},
volume = {33},
number = {12},
pages = {1745--1749},
abstract = {Purpose To investigate the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries in the United States. Basic Procedures The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was used to examine non-fatal zipline-related injuries treated in US emergency departments (EDs) from 1997 through 2012. Sample weights were applied to calculate national estimates. Main Findings From 1997 through 2012, an estimated 16 850 (95% CI, 13 188-20 512) zipline-related injuries were treated in US EDs. The annual injury rate per 1 million population increased by 52.3% from 7.64 (95% CI, 4.86-10.42) injuries in 2009 (the first year with a stable annual estimate) to 11.64 (95% CI, 7.83-15.45) injuries in 2012. Patients aged 0-9 years accounted for 45.0% of injuries, females made up 53.1% of injuries, and 11.7% of patients required hospitalization. Fractures accounted for the largest proportion of injuries (46.7%), and the upper extremities were the most commonly injured body region (44.1%). Falls were the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 77.3% of injuries. Among cases where the location of the injury event was known, 30.8% of injuries occurred in a residential setting and 69.2% occurred in a public place. Principal Conclusions This study is the first to characterize the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries using a nationally representative database. The rapid increase in zipline-related injuries in recent years suggests the need for additional safety guidelines and regulations. Commercial ziplines and publicly accessible non-commercial ziplines should be subject to uniform safety standards in all states and jurisdictions across the US, and homemade ziplines should not be used. © 2015 Elsevier Inc.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Liu, C Y; Law, M; Romano, R
Rational approach to understanding and preventing sports-related traumatic brain injuries Journal Article
In: World Neurosurgery, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1556–1557, 2015.
@article{Liu2015,
title = {Rational approach to understanding and preventing sports-related traumatic brain injuries},
author = {Liu, C Y and Law, M and Romano, R},
doi = {10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.076},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {World Neurosurgery},
volume = {84},
number = {6},
pages = {1556--1557},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Perry, C E; Buhrman, J R
Effect of helmet inertial properties on head and neck response during +Gz impact accelerations Journal Article
In: Journal of Gravitational Physiology: a Journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. P88–91, 1995.
@article{Perry1995,
title = {Effect of helmet inertial properties on head and neck response during +Gz impact accelerations},
author = {Perry, C E and Buhrman, J R},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Gravitational Physiology: a Journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology},
volume = {2},
number = {1},
pages = {P88--91},
abstract = {The objective of the test program was to study the effect of parametric changes in helmet inertial properties on the biodynamic response of human volunteers subjected to +Gz impact accelerations. Test data was used to drive a computer model (DYNAMAN) to estimate the loads and torques in the neck during impact. Currently, only seven of eleven test cells with variations in the inertial properties of the helmet along the x-axis of the head have been analyzed. Preliminary data analysis indicates that the biodynamic response of the head under the tested conditions is slightly more sensitive to the moment of inertia of the helmet than its weight alone even though both variables showed a general trend for the head accelerations (linear and angular) to increase. It has been shown that the model can give good estimates of the compression loads in the neck, but that the torque estimates will be low, possibly by a factor of three. Further refinements of the neck joint parameters in the model will be required in order to increase the motion of the head segment during impact acceleration and will be done prior to completing the remaining test cell analysis. Finally, all the test data will be evaluated to determine if the current interim head criteria require modification.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Sethi, N K
Post-concussion return to boxing protocol Journal Article
In: South African Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 61–62, 2016.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Boxers (Sports), Boxing, Concussion, CONCUSSION policies, PHYSIOLOGY, Return-to-play, SAFETY, SPORTS -- Safety measures
@article{Sethi2016,
title = {Post-concussion return to boxing protocol},
author = {Sethi, N K},
doi = {10.17159/2078-516X/2016/v28i2a464},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {South African Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {28},
number = {2},
pages = {61--62},
abstract = {Background: Concussion is a complex pathophysiological process affecting the brain, induced by traumatic biomechanical forces. Immediately following a concussion, an athlete is usually advised physical and cognitive rest until post-concussion symptoms abate. The athlete then enters a stepwise return-to-play protocol. Premature return to play risks a second concussion, second impact syndrome, exacerbation and persistence of post-concussive symptoms. Various sports governing organisations such as the National Football League have developed postconcussion return to play protocols. Discussion: Professional boxing is a popular contact sport in which concussions are common. Professional boxing currently lacks a standardised post-concussion return to boxing protocol. Professional boxers are arbitrarily suspended for periods ranging from 30 to 90 days after suffering a technical knockout (TKO) due to multiple head and body shots or after a knockout (KO). For some boxers a neurology clearance is requested prior to their return to boxing. Conclusion: Developing and implementing a postconcussion return to the boxing protocol will standardise a return to boxing decision-making process and help to protect a boxer's health. This paper proposes a postconcussion return to boxing protocol with the recommendation that the proposed protocol be debated vigorously by the scientific community and evidence-based guidelines be developed by the medical community in conjunction with the professional boxing governing bodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]},
keywords = {Boxers (Sports), Boxing, Concussion, CONCUSSION policies, PHYSIOLOGY, Return-to-play, SAFETY, SPORTS -- Safety measures},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Hernandez, F; Shull, P B; Camarillo, D B
Evaluation of a laboratory model of human head impact biomechanics Journal Article
In: Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3469–3477, 2015.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *HEAD, *Laboratories, *Mechanical Phenomena, *Models, Acceleration, Biological, Biomechanical Phenomena, Brain Concussion/et [Etiology], Football/in [Injuries], Head Protective Devices, Humans, Male, Neck/ph [Physiology], Rotation, SAFETY
@article{Hernandez2015,
title = {Evaluation of a laboratory model of human head impact biomechanics},
author = {Hernandez, F and Shull, P B and Camarillo, D B},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Biomechanics},
volume = {48},
number = {12},
pages = {3469--3477},
abstract = {This work describes methodology for evaluating laboratory models of head impact biomechanics. Using this methodology, we investigated: how closely does twin-wire drop testing model head rotation in American football impacts? Head rotation is believed to cause mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) but helmet safety standards only model head translations believed to cause severe TBI. It is unknown whether laboratory head impact models in safety standards, like twin-wire drop testing, reproduce six degree-of-freedom (6DOF) head impact biomechanics that may cause mTBI. We compared 6DOF measurements of 421 American football head impacts to twin-wire drop tests at impact sites and velocities weighted to represent typical field exposure. The highest rotational velocities produced by drop testing were the 74th percentile of non-injury field impacts. For a given translational acceleration level, drop testing underestimated field rotational acceleration by 46% and rotational velocity by 72%. Primary rotational acceleration frequencies were much larger in drop tests ($sim$100 Hz) than field impacts ($sim$10 Hz). Drop testing was physically unable to produce acceleration directions common in field impacts. Initial conditions of a single field impact were highly resolved in stereo high-speed video and reconstructed in a drop test. Reconstruction results reflected aggregate trends of lower amplitude rotational velocity and higher frequency rotational acceleration in drop testing, apparently due to twin-wire constraints and the absence of a neck. These results suggest twin-wire drop testing is limited in modeling head rotation during impact, and motivate continued evaluation of head impact models to ensure helmets are tested under conditions that may cause mTBI. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {*HEAD, *Laboratories, *Mechanical Phenomena, *Models, Acceleration, Biological, Biomechanical Phenomena, Brain Concussion/et [Etiology], Football/in [Injuries], Head Protective Devices, Humans, Male, Neck/ph [Physiology], Rotation, SAFETY},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Billock, R M; Anderegg, J J; Mehan, T J; Chounthirath, T; Smith, G A
Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012 Journal Article
In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1745–1749, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Accidental Falls, Adolescent, adult, arm fracture, Article, body regions, Child, Concussion, emergency health service, Emergency Service, emergency ward, EPIDEMIOLOGY, falling, Female, head and neck injury, head injury, Hospital, hospitalization, human, Humans, Infant, leg injury, major clinical study, Male, Newborn, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, recreation, residential area, SAFETY, soft tissue injury, sport injury, sprain, statistics and numerical data, trunk injury, UNITED States, Wounds and Injuries, Young Adult, zipline related injury
@article{Billock2015,
title = {Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012},
author = {Billock, R M and Anderegg, J J and Mehan, T J and Chounthirath, T and Smith, G A},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.022},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Emergency Medicine},
volume = {33},
number = {12},
pages = {1745--1749},
abstract = {Purpose To investigate the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries in the United States. Basic Procedures The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was used to examine non-fatal zipline-related injuries treated in US emergency departments (EDs) from 1997 through 2012. Sample weights were applied to calculate national estimates. Main Findings From 1997 through 2012, an estimated 16 850 (95% CI, 13 188-20 512) zipline-related injuries were treated in US EDs. The annual injury rate per 1 million population increased by 52.3% from 7.64 (95% CI, 4.86-10.42) injuries in 2009 (the first year with a stable annual estimate) to 11.64 (95% CI, 7.83-15.45) injuries in 2012. Patients aged 0-9 years accounted for 45.0% of injuries, females made up 53.1% of injuries, and 11.7% of patients required hospitalization. Fractures accounted for the largest proportion of injuries (46.7%), and the upper extremities were the most commonly injured body region (44.1%). Falls were the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 77.3% of injuries. Among cases where the location of the injury event was known, 30.8% of injuries occurred in a residential setting and 69.2% occurred in a public place. Principal Conclusions This study is the first to characterize the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries using a nationally representative database. The rapid increase in zipline-related injuries in recent years suggests the need for additional safety guidelines and regulations. Commercial ziplines and publicly accessible non-commercial ziplines should be subject to uniform safety standards in all states and jurisdictions across the US, and homemade ziplines should not be used. © 2015 Elsevier Inc.},
keywords = {Accidental Falls, Adolescent, adult, arm fracture, Article, body regions, Child, Concussion, emergency health service, Emergency Service, emergency ward, EPIDEMIOLOGY, falling, Female, head and neck injury, head injury, Hospital, hospitalization, human, Humans, Infant, leg injury, major clinical study, Male, Newborn, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, recreation, residential area, SAFETY, soft tissue injury, sport injury, sprain, statistics and numerical data, trunk injury, UNITED States, Wounds and Injuries, Young Adult, zipline related injury},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Liu, C Y; Law, M; Romano, R
Rational approach to understanding and preventing sports-related traumatic brain injuries Journal Article
In: World Neurosurgery, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1556–1557, 2015.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: accelerometer, ACCELEROMETRY, biological marker, brain, brain concussion, brain hemorrhage, cognitive defect, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Electroencephalography, emergency health service, Female, Head Protective Devices, Helmet, high risk patient, human, Humans, Injuries, Male, neuroimaging, neuromodulation, neuroprotective agent, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, Occupational Exposure, protective equipment, Review, risk factor, risk reduction, SAFETY, skiing, Snowboarding, sport injury, Traumatic, traumatic brain injury, viscoelastic substance
@article{Liu2015,
title = {Rational approach to understanding and preventing sports-related traumatic brain injuries},
author = {Liu, C Y and Law, M and Romano, R},
doi = {10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.076},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {World Neurosurgery},
volume = {84},
number = {6},
pages = {1556--1557},
keywords = {accelerometer, ACCELEROMETRY, biological marker, brain, brain concussion, brain hemorrhage, cognitive defect, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Electroencephalography, emergency health service, Female, Head Protective Devices, Helmet, high risk patient, human, Humans, Injuries, Male, neuroimaging, neuromodulation, neuroprotective agent, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, Occupational Exposure, protective equipment, Review, risk factor, risk reduction, SAFETY, skiing, Snowboarding, sport injury, Traumatic, traumatic brain injury, viscoelastic substance},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Perry, C E; Buhrman, J R
Effect of helmet inertial properties on head and neck response during +Gz impact accelerations Journal Article
In: Journal of Gravitational Physiology: a Journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. P88–91, 1995.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Acceleration/ae [Adverse Effects], *Head Protective Devices, *Neck/ph [Physiology], Aircraft, Aviation, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer simulation, Equipment Design, Head Movements, Humans, Military personnel, Motion, Neck Injuries, SAFETY
@article{Perry1995,
title = {Effect of helmet inertial properties on head and neck response during +Gz impact accelerations},
author = {Perry, C E and Buhrman, J R},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Gravitational Physiology: a Journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology},
volume = {2},
number = {1},
pages = {P88--91},
abstract = {The objective of the test program was to study the effect of parametric changes in helmet inertial properties on the biodynamic response of human volunteers subjected to +Gz impact accelerations. Test data was used to drive a computer model (DYNAMAN) to estimate the loads and torques in the neck during impact. Currently, only seven of eleven test cells with variations in the inertial properties of the helmet along the x-axis of the head have been analyzed. Preliminary data analysis indicates that the biodynamic response of the head under the tested conditions is slightly more sensitive to the moment of inertia of the helmet than its weight alone even though both variables showed a general trend for the head accelerations (linear and angular) to increase. It has been shown that the model can give good estimates of the compression loads in the neck, but that the torque estimates will be low, possibly by a factor of three. Further refinements of the neck joint parameters in the model will be required in order to increase the motion of the head segment during impact acceleration and will be done prior to completing the remaining test cell analysis. Finally, all the test data will be evaluated to determine if the current interim head criteria require modification.},
keywords = {*Acceleration/ae [Adverse Effects], *Head Protective Devices, *Neck/ph [Physiology], Aircraft, Aviation, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer simulation, Equipment Design, Head Movements, Humans, Military personnel, Motion, Neck Injuries, SAFETY},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}